Early this year I received a spam email about “The Congressional Reform Act of 2011.” I looked at it and thought that most of it sounded like good suggestions to me, but what were the facts. After a bit of research I found out that FactCheck.org had vetted the email pretty throughly and had done a good job of showing where the original person, who started the email, was uninformed on parts of their Act. While I make no claim to know much about politics, I was interested and decided to look into the parts of the “Act” that FactCheck did not make specific comments about. Specifically Term Limits, Pay Raises and Health Care. What follows are my suggestions from the viewpoint of a past government employee. -U.S Army Infantry, Sniper.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust. The elective mode of obtaining rulers is the characteristic policy of republican government. The means relied on in this form of government for preventing their degeneracy are numerous and various. The most effectual one, is such a limitation of the term of appointments as will maintain a proper responsibility to the people.” You can read here that when our great Nation was newly formed it was understood that if you allowed individuals to stay in government for an extended period the would most likely become disconnected with the populous and start to favor the “elevation of the few on the ruins of the many.”
- Term Limits.
12 years only, one of the possible options below..
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
- No Tenure / No Pension.
A legislator collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office. They currently can receive up to 80% of their salary after one term, how much they receive depends on many factors. A soldier who serves less than 20 years and does not get injured gets no pension why should our legislatures get better consideration?
- Pay Raises -Currently they get an automatic raise to match COLA, unless they vote against it.
Our legislators will no longer get a COLA (Cost Of Living Allowance) adjustment if the Country in is debt. If Social Security, Armed Forces, and Disabled Veterans do not get it why should they?
- Our legislators should participate in the same health system as the Military and Veterans since they all work for the same government it only makes sense. Also, this might improve the quality of care and treatment of Veterans in the VA hospitals.
I feel that we need to overhaul the system. For me it was an honor to serve in the U.S Army and so serving in Congress should be an honor. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.
How do we decide on WHO should represent “We the People” for that I close with a quote from the Federalist Papers #57
Who are to be the electors of the federal representatives? Not the rich, more than the poor; not the learned, more than the ignorant; not the haughty heirs of distinguished names, more than the humble sons of obscurity and unpropitious fortune. The electors are to be the great body of the people of the United States.